Bye-bye Books

I purged a bunch of stuff off the shelves. Of course, not everything I got rid of is something I didn’t like — I just figure it can remain part of my virtual library without having to take up real space. And of course, some of the stuff I got rid of I’ve already forgotten and hope to never think about again. Here are a few that stay in the virtual library.

*** Walter Gropius – The New Architecture and the Bauhaus. I took a modern architecture class in college, for which this was one of the textbooks. I love modern architecture, both the good and the bad, both the successes and the magnificent failures, and I love the Bauhaus. I kept this so long mostly as a reminder of that.
*** Julian Barnes – Talking it Over. This was the book that taught me terms like “crepuscular” and “rebarbatively quotidian”. It’s also one of the first “unreliable narrator” books I remember really noticing and appreciating. Its Rashomon-like structure makes for some very funny bits. I may even want to reread this one again someday (though I somehow never connected that much with other of his books), but had gotten kind of tired of it.
** Milorad Pavic – Dictionary of the Khazars. One of the few books that survived the wax and wane of my interest in experimental fiction. I read a lot of gimmicky books for a while there, and this was one of the few in which I thought the gimmick (story told in a series of encyclopedia entries in multiple conflicting encyclopedias, and the user must do his own cross-referencing) had something to it. Though as often happens, the decent gimmick was somewhat wasted on a story that wasn’t itself that compelling (see e.g. Timecode).
*** Roald Dahl – My Uncle Oswald. I love Roald Dahl, but Uncle Oswald isn’t really one of his better inventions.
*** Dorris Dorrie – Love, Pain, and the Whole Damn Thing. I really liked this book sometime in the 90s (and the lovely Edward Gorey cover on my edition), but I just didn’t think I’d want to read it again.
Leo Marks – Between Silk and Cyanide. Already reviewed.
Charles Yu – Third Class Superhero. Already reviewed.
Patrick Neate – City of Tiny Lights. Already reviewed.
Patrick Suskind – Perfume
Jeffrey Steingarten – The Man Who Ate Everything
Georges Perec – Life A User’s Manual. I mostly enjoyed this. It was left behind by an ex-girlfriend.

Movies, July 2010

*** City Lights
*** True Blood, Season 2
**** Miss Pettigrew Lives For A Day
*** I Am Love

I don’t really have much to add to the reams of ink and bits that have presumably been spilled praising Charlie Chaplin, except to say that I liked this movie pretty well. As with many movies this old, it sometimes was a little silly or a little slow for my modern attention span, but otherwise thumbs up.

I didn’t intend to watch True Blood with E, but I somehow got sucked in and watched most of Season 2. I thought it was mostly good, except I ended up getting very tired of the whole Maryann storyline. It just didn’t really make dramatic sense — she was far too powerful to have been around for thousands of years without anyone noticing, since she could basically go anywhere and make anyone do anything she wanted. Come on. Plus, she got really annoying.

I think I’ve said it before, but I think Miss Pettigrew is pretty much a perfect movie. It’s not big in scope or anything, but just about everything in it is perfect, and everyone and everything is so damn appealing.

E and I really liked I Am Love, in spite of its unsubtle symbolism and drama (and its sometimes intrusively overly-obvious music). The main reason, of course, is Tilda Swinton, who is usually amazing and was definitely here. She is simply a pleasure to watch.

Books, July 2010

** Matt Ruff – Sewer, Gas, and Electric
*** Michael Moorcock – Elric (the original six novels)
*** Wendy Pini – Law and Chaos
*** Jim Thompson – The Grifters

I really enjoyed Sewer, Gas, and Electric the first time around. This time it just felt like someone trying too hard to throw a bunch of “funny” stuff into one book in order to create the best-sounding back-cover blurb. Giant killer sharks in the NYC sewers! A shark named after a beer!!! Etc! It was an okay time, but eh.

Michael Moorcock is not a bad writer. Or so I’m told — I don’t feel like I can judge very well, since I read most of his stuff when I was much younger and perhaps not a great judge of writing quality. However, the Elric books are really not that well written. There’s a lot of the cardinal sin of telling rather than showing — we’re often told things are evil or unnatural or whatever, and we have to take it on trust. It’s all fairly trashy — and yet, I pretty much sped through the entire six-book series (six thin, lightweight books, I admit) at full speed, compelled to see the whole thing through. So he’s got something going for him. Anyway, Elric is a lovable hero, the tortured emo anti-hero, doomed to kill those he loves and agonize about it to the uncaring gods. Plus, he looks cool.

Having finished the Elric books off, I decided to dig out Law and Chaos, Wendy Pini’s book of drawings from her never-realized animated Elric movie. I’ve had that book about as long as my Elric books (and going back to when I read ElfQuest and may even have admitted to reading it in public), and so her images are inseparable from Moorcock’s words in my head. It’s probably been 20 years since I even looked much at that book, and many of the scenes were still perfectly familiar. The art isn’t great — it’s a little too elfish/fey for Elric perhaps (not surprising from a very young-at-the-time artist who would go on to create ElfQuest) and it certainly doesn’t shy away from the emo aspect of Elric (again, not surprising), but it’s mostly a good fit for Moorcock’s character, and anyone who likes Elric would probably appreciate it.

The Grifters was good stuff, makes me want to read more Jim Thompson.

Movies, August 2010

*** Inception
** Daniel Deronda
** Public Enemies
*** Cowboy Bebop, The Movie

Inception was pretty good. It certainly was fun to look at, and it’s fun to think about the various theories afterward — who was incepting whom? which of the various things we saw was “reality”, if any? though honestly, the question of whether the top stopped spinning was I think the dumbest of the bunch. Nolan might as well have tacked “OR IS IT?!” onto “THE END”. I don’t really agree with people who thought it was one of the best movies evar, but nor do I agree with people who thought it was hard to follow or basically incoherent. It wasn’t that complicated, it has a fairly straightforward interpretation that mostly makes sense, and the basic premise is good, though some of the details are pretty sillier (than no sillier than many other decent science fiction movies).

I didn’t really know what to expect from Daniel Deronda having neither read it nor heard much about it. It goes some surprising places, like (spoilers) having Daniel turn out to be Jewish and decide to become some sort of proto-zionist and having him end up with the poor Jewish singer girl rather than the beautiful blonde who appears to be the lead character. Some of this was probably the fault of this production — Gwen (the blonde) seemed to be a more central character than Daniel himself, and the two of them seem to have a lot of chemistry, so it’s a bit surprising that they don’t end up together. I simply wasn’t that interested in the Jewish “I must find my roots!” stuff, partly because it seemed so grounded in the idea that your born race/religion/whatever is your destiny, a notion I find repugnant. I didn’t hate this, but I don’t recommend it very strongly and it doesn’t make me want to read the book.

Public Enemies should have been much better than it was. If there’s one thing I love about a crime drama, it’s the classic heist setup and all that, and that was basically absent here. The movie drifted around for a while without setting up much dramatic tension, and there are a lot of characters that sort of come and go. Plus, the whole movie is unbelievable dark — like, literally so, so that it’s hard to see what’s going on. So, snuh.

I have been reading the unbelievable series on Cowboy Bebop on Overthinking It (I love that blog), which gave me a craving to see it again. Unfortunately, there’s a very long wait on the TV series DVDs at netflix, so I rented the movie. And the movie somehow failed to live up to my overthinking-it-stoked expectations. It just didn’t feel that compelling. I still want to watch the TV series again, though I fear that, as with many pieces of pop culture that get relentlessly analyzed, it may just turn out to be a piece of pop culture on which some creative person has heaped a lot of meaning that maybe wasn’t there in the first place. Or maybe not.

Books, August 2010

*** Denise Mina – Deception
*** Willa Cather – Death Comes for the Archbishop

Deception is a sort of thriller/mystery, with a sometimes unlikeable and pathetic narrator, Lachlan. His wife has been convicted of murder, and as he tries to find evidence to exonerate her, he instead learns more and more about the deceptions that underlay his marriage. In the end, the book is more a psychological portrait, of Lachlan and of the relationship of these two people. I found it interesting for its story and characters, but also to the extent that anyone who’s been in a relationship can identify somewhat with what goes wrong in this one. Anyway, this was my first Denise Mina book, and though it’s apparently nontypical, I’m looking forward to reading more.

I don’t feel like I really “got” Death Comes for the Archbishop. It was good, and I found the character of Latour fairly interesting, but on the whole I didn’t find the book that compelling. I felt like there was a certain amount of distance maintained between the reader and the characters, partly because large portions of their lives were sort of skipped over. For example, for much of the book Latour wants to build a cathedral, and it seems like it may become part of his big life’s work, a major focus of the book. But then the book skips ahead a bit, the cathedral is casually mentioned as having been completed, and that’s the last we hear. I also kept wondering why Willa Cather wanted to tell the story of this guy and what I the reader was supposed to get out of it. Of course, sometimes one wants to tell the story of an ordinary person, but in most books I think there’s some core character trait or story that the author feels compelled to draw out and present to readers. In this book I kept wondering — why does Cather care, and why should I?