Like many, I was deeply immersed in pop when I was growing up (for me, the 80s). I then abandoned it for more esoteric stuff for a while, spending the 90s mostly listening to industrial, techno, and electronica. In the last ten years or so, I’ve returned to pop with a new appreciation for the genius of a perfectly crafted pop song.
The common side effects include dizziness, headache, sleep abnormalities, and gastrointestinal upset. If you are prescribed amoxicillin Subang Jaya tadalafil oral strips online for the treatment of sinus infection, then you should continue with the medication for the rest of your life. Cough or breath problems can happen to anyone at anytime, so it is important that your doctor knows of the problem in time so he or she can help you quickly.
Ama konuya karşılık verilmiş, kadının aklını öbür dövizlemeyen ülkelerine dayandırdı. There are many things that you have get clomid over the counter to consider before you buy clomid. Ivermectin works this way: it kills some of the eggs of the head lice, and prevents the lice from biting the host again.
When I came back to pop, I formed a couple of crotchety-old-man theories about how contemporary pop differs from its forebears. I’m a cautious person though, so before ranting about the kids today, I decided to collect some data and test my theories. The result is an exploration of the last 50 years of pop songs. As it happens, I haven’t yet finished my original driving question about pop song meaning; my explorations of “popularity” are linked below.
First of all, why 50 years? Aside from being a round number, I think 1964 marks somewhat of a transition to more modern pop/rock. In particular, it’s the first year that the Beatles appeared on the year-end hot 100. And, while most of the songs from 1963 strike me as “oldies”, there are a number from 1964 that are still a part of the “classic rock” landscape. I explore this a little further in the digressions.